The confidence versus experience is a hypothetical cognitive bias stating that individuals with low capacity at an errand misjudge their own capacity, and that individuals with high capacity at an assignment think little of their own ability.
As depicted by social psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the inclination results from an inward deception in individuals of low capacity and from an outside misperception in individuals of high capacity; that is, "the miscalibration of the inept stems from a mistake about oneself, while the miscalibration of the profoundly skillful stems from a blunder about others".[1] It is identified with the psychological predisposition of illusory superiority and comes from individuals' failure to perceive their absence of capacity. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, individuals can't unbiasedly assess their degree of competence.
No comments:
Post a Comment